چکیده (انگلیسی):

This study investigated the ideal definition of QB, that is Quality Book- one that is ideally suited for translation- and the
variables affecting its selection criteria among 136 members of King Saud University (KSU) academic staff. A
workshop was held to elicit the ideal definition of QB to answer the first question, and a 19-item electronic
questionnaire with four domains was designed to help collect the data necessary to answer the other two questions of
the study. The results revealed that all four domains came low; “Authorship and Publication” came the highest with a
mean score of 2.28 and “Titling and Contents” came the lowest with a mean score of 1.76. 5-way ANOVA (without
interaction) was applied in accordance with the variables of the study at ≤ 0.05 among the mean scores. The analysis
revealed significance of the variables of gender, those who translated a book or more before, and those who participated
in a conference devoted for translation whereas the variables of qualification and revising a translated book did not
reveal any statistical significance.