ورود به سایت

در سایت حساب کاربری ندارید؟ ثبت نام در سایت (به زودی!)

ثبت نام

دانلود انواع مقالات آی اس آی

دسته بندی مقالات

با عضویت در سایت مقاله یاب از تخفیف ویژه بهرمند شوید! عضويت (به زودی!)
تاریخ امروز
دوشنبه, ۱۰ اردیبهشت

ترجیح دادن روش آموزش سنتی توسط معلمان و دانش آموزان نسب به مدل یادگیری با هم(مطالعه با هم)، علی رغم نتایج عملکرد مشابه، آزمایش تصادفی

Educators and students prefer traditional clinical education to a peer-assistedlearning model, despite similar student performance outcam randomised triale:

نویسندگان

این بخش تنها برای اعضا قابل مشاهده است

ورودعضویت
اطلاعات مجله journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jphys
سال انتشار Journal of Physiotherapy 60 (2014) 209–216
فرمت فایل PDF
کد مقاله 7050

پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.

اضافه‌کردن به سبدخرید

چکیده (انگلیسی):

Question: What is the efficacy and acceptability of a peer-assisted learning model compared with a
traditional model for paired students in physiotherapy clinical education? Design: Prospective, assessorblinded,
randomised crossover trial. Participants: Twenty-four physiotherapy students in the third year
of a 4-year undergraduate degree. Intervention: Participants each completed 5 weeks of clinical
placement, utilising a peer-assisted learning model (a standardised series of learning activities
undertaken by student pairs and educators to facilitate peer interaction using guided strategies) and a
traditionalmodel (usual clinical supervision and learning activities led by clinical educators supervising
pairs of students). Outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was student performance, rated
on the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice by a blinded assessor, the supervising clinical educator and
by the student in self-assessment. Secondary outcome measures were satisfaction with the teaching and
learning experience measured via survey, and statistics on services delivered. Results: There were no
significant between-group differences in Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice scores as rated by the
blinded assessor (p = 0.43), the supervising clinical educator (p = 0.94) or the students (p = 0.99). In peerassisted
learning, clinical educators had an extra 6 minutes/day available for non-student-related quality
activities (95% CI 1 to 10) and students received an additional 0.33 entries/day of written feedback from
their educator (95% CI 0.06 to 0.61). Clinical educator satisfaction and student satisfaction were higher
with the traditional model. Conclusion: The peer-assisted learning model trialled in the present study
produced similar student performance outcomes when compared with a traditional approach. Peerassisted
learning provided some benefits to educator workload and student feedback, but both educators
and students weremore satisfiedwith the traditional model. Trial registration: ACTRN12610000859088.
[Sevenhuysen S, Skinner EH, Farlie MK, Raitman L, Nickson W, Keating JL,Maloney S, Molloy E, Haines
TP (2014) Educators and students prefer traditional clinical education to a peer-assisted learning
model, despite similar student performance outcomes: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy

کلمات کلیدی مقاله (فارسی):

دانش آموزان، آموزش، یادگیری،حرفه ای

کلمات کلیدی مقاله (انگلیسی):

Professional ،Students،Education،Learning

پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.

اضافه‌کردن به سبدخرید
کلیه حقوق مادی و معنوی برای ایران مقاله محفوظ است
در حال بارگذاری