ورود به سایت

در سایت حساب کاربری ندارید؟ ثبت نام در سایت (به زودی!)

ثبت نام

دانلود انواع مقالات آی اس آی

دسته بندی مقالات

با عضویت در سایت مقاله یاب از تخفیف ویژه بهرمند شوید! عضويت (به زودی!)
تاریخ امروز
دوشنبه, ۱۴ اسفند

گویا فرایندهای تصمیم گیری انتخاب انصاف بیش از پول به دست آوردن عنوان معیارهای تصمیم گیری

Rational Decision-Making Process Choosing Fairness Over Monetary Gain as Decision Criteria

نویسندگان

این بخش تنها برای اعضا قابل مشاهده است

ورودعضویت
اطلاعات مجله : 16-23 2014 sciencepg
سال انتشار 2014
فرمت فایل PDF
کد مقاله 26472

پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.

اضافه‌کردن به سبدخرید

چکیده (انگلیسی):

Objective: This study tests the hypothesis that the decision-making process in humans is often based on the fairness rather than the monetary gain/loss, when they are confronted with a choice between fairness and monetary gain/loss. Methods: The classical Ultimatum Game (UG) is used as the experimental paradigm to quantify the threshold crossover-point to switch the decision from rejection to acceptance. The fairness stimulus-response function is used for quantifying the decision threshold and the co-variation relationship between fairness and monetary gain/loss. Results: The results show that the level of fairness perception is always 27.5% lower for the rejection decision than the acceptance decision, irrespective of the offer-ratio (i.e., monetary gain/loss) or the baseline level of fairness for that decision. The data also show a co-variation relationship between fairness and offer-ratio (monetary gain/loss), but such proportionality relationship is decoupled at the even-split singularity point. The analysis shows that the decision crossover threshold is located at a slightly unfair perception, indicating tolerance to some unfairness in the decision. This suggests that a rejection decision is made when the unfairness perception threshold is reached. Conclusion: These analyses validated the hypothesis that the decision to accept/reject the monetary offer is logically consistent using the fairness criterion as the threshold for decision along the fairness-axis — even for accepting inequitable offers or rejecting hyper-equitable offers, irrespective of the amount of monetary gain/loss. The apparent decision based on the monetary gain/loss criterion is only a side effect of the co-variation between fairness and monetary gain.


کلمات کلیدی مقاله (فارسی):

تصمیم گیری، انصاف تعصب، حقوق صاحبان سهام، تصمیم منطقی، پول به دست آوردن، اولتیماتوم بازی

کلمات کلیدی مقاله (انگلیسی):

Decision-Making, Fairness Bias, Equity, Rational Decision, Monetary Gain, Ultimatum Game

پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.

اضافه‌کردن به سبدخرید
کلیه حقوق مادی و معنوی برای ایران مقاله محفوظ است
در حال بارگذاری