ورود به سایت

در سایت حساب کاربری ندارید؟ ثبت نام در سایت (به زودی!)

ثبت نام

دانلود انواع مقالات آی اس آی

دسته بندی مقالات

با عضویت در سایت مقاله یاب از تخفیف ویژه بهرمند شوید! عضويت (به زودی!)
تاریخ امروز
پنج شنبه, ۴ بهمن

همکاری بین عمل ابداکتور لگن، همترازی دینامیکی عقب پا و والگوس دینامیکی زانو هنگام اسکوات تک پا و زمین خوردن.

Association between hip abductor function, rear-foot dynamic alignment, and dynamic knee valgus during single-leg squats and drop landings

نویسندگان

این بخش تنها برای اعضا قابل مشاهده است

ورودعضویت
اطلاعات مجله journal of sport and health science 4 2015
سال انتشار Received 18 February 2013; revised 31 May 2013; accepted 28 August 2013 Available online 8 November 2013
فرمت فایل PDF
کد مقاله 757

پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.

اضافه‌کردن به سبدخرید

چکیده (انگلیسی):

Background: Preventing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is very important for athletes, and dynamic knee valgus is considered a risk factor for non-contact ACL injury. However, little is known about whether the functions of the hip abductor and rear-foot increase dynamic knee valgus. A two-dimensional (2D) video-based screening test focused on hip abductor and rear-foot functions among factors involved in dynamic knee valgus. The present study determined associations between hip and rear-foot dynamic alignment and dynamic knee valgus. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 130 female basketball players (258 legs) from nine high-school teams. The players performed single-leg squats and single-leg drop landings to provide knee-in (KID) and hip-out (HOD) distances on 2D video images. Hip and rear-foot dynamic alignment was evaluated using a dynamic Trendelenburg test (DTT) and a dynamic heel-floor test (HFT). Results: The Chi-square test revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of DTT-positivity between single-leg squats (28.7%) and singleleg drop landings (23.3%). The prevalence of HFT-positivity was significantly greater during landings (51.4%) than during single-leg squats (31.0%, p < 0.01). The KID values for both single-leg squats and single-leg drop landings were greater in the DTT-positive than in the DTTnegative group (15.1 5.4 cm and 20.2 7.5 cm, p < 0.001). The HOD values were similarly greater in the DTT-positive group (15.2 1.9 cm and 17.6 2.8 cm, p < 0.001). The KID values for both single-leg squats and single-leg drop landings were greater in the HFT-positive than in the HFT-negative group (12.2 5.1 cm, p < 0.01; 14.7 7.2 cm, p < 0.001), whereas HOD values for these tasks did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusion: Dynamic hip mal-alignment might be associated with both greater KID and HOD, whereas rear-foot eversion is associated only with greater KID. Hip abductor and rear-foot dysfunction are important factors for dynamic knee valgus and thus evaluating DTT and HFT will help to prevent dynamic knee valgus.

کلمات کلیدی مقاله (فارسی):

ازمایش غربالگری دو بعدی، آسیب ACL، همترازی دینامیکی، عمل ابداکتور لگن و پشت پا، جلوگیری

کلمات کلیدی مقاله (انگلیسی):

2D screening test; ACL injury; Dynamic alignment; Hip abductor and rear-foot function; Prevention

پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.

اضافه‌کردن به سبدخرید
کلیه حقوق مادی و معنوی برای ایران مقاله محفوظ است
در حال بارگذاری