چکیده (انگلیسی):

Background:There has been growing interest regarding the impact of telemonitoring and its ability to reduce the
increasing burden of chronic diseases, including chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD), on healthcare systems. A
number of randomised trials have been undertaken internationally and synthesised into various systematic reviews
to establish an evidence base for this model of care. This study sought to synthesise and critically evaluate this
large body of evidence to inform clinicians, researchers and policy makers.
Methods:A systematic review of systematic reviews investigating the impact of telemonitoring interventions in the
primary care management of CVD was conducted. Reviews were included if they explored primary care based
telemonitoring in either CVD, heart failure or hypertension, were reported in the English language and were
published between 2000 and 2013. Data was extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer using a
standardised form. Two assessors then rated the quality of each review using the Overview Quality Assessment
Questionnaire (OQAQ).
Results:Of the 13 included reviews, four focused on telemonitoring interventions in hypertension or CVD
management and the remaining 9 reviews investigated telemonitoring in HF management. Seven reviews scored a
five or above on the OQAQ evidencing good quality reviews. Findings suggest that telemonitoring can contribute
to significant reductions in blood pressure, decreased all-cause and HF related hospitalisations, reduced all-cause
mortality and improved quality of life. Telemonitoring was also demonstrated to reduce health care costs and
appears acceptable to patients.
Conclusion:Telemonitoring has the potential to enhance primary care management of CVD by improving patient
outcomes and reducing health costs. However, further research needs to explore the specific elements of
telemonitoring interventions to determine the relative value of the various elements. Additionally, the ways in
which telemonitoring care improves health outcomes needs to be further explored to understand the nature of
these interventions.