چکیده (انگلیسی):

Background: Pectus excavatum (PE) is a common chest wall deformity. There are
several surgical alternatives for the repair of PE. In our practice, the sternal turnover (STO)
procedure had been performed for decades. In 2008, we started treating PE patients with
the Nuss procedure. Our objective of this study is to compare these two procedures.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 50 patients undergoing pectus excavatum
repairs from March 2005 to January 2013, including 20 patients with the STO procedure
and 30 patients with the Nuss procedure. Patients were evaluated for type of repair performed,
operating time, drainage after operation, length of postoperative stay, complications,
and cosmetic results.
Results: The mean age of the STO group was 11.0 years and that of the Nuss group was 15.0 years
(p Z 0.353). The Nuss procedure had a much shorter mean operating time, a less mean drainage
after operation, and a shorter mean time to drainage tube removal than those of the STO procedure.
The rate of complication was 40.0% (8/20) in the STO group and 33.3% (10/30) in the Nuss
group. Follow-up data indicated that 90% (18/20) of patients in the STO group and 96.7% (29/30)
of patients in the Nuss group regarded the results as good or excellent (p Z 0.965).
Conclusion: Our data suggests that both the STO and Nuss procedures are equally safe and effective
correction methods. However, less trauma, faster recovery, and better cosmetic results are
the benefits of the Nuss procedure.