چکیده (انگلیسی):

Although it is widely recognized that individuals learn in different ways, there is some
disagreement on the paths learners take. Responding to Kolb’s (1984) Experiential Learning
Model, Jarvis proposed an Existential Learning Model to identify multiple routes that learners
use. Examining Jarvis’ model critically reveals some problems: the model does not reflect either
its supporting text or sound modeling practices and conventions, is subject to an error in
discourse, and fails to depict the specific learning routes that Jarvis’ own research identified. This
paper develops Jarvis’ model to align it with the theory, clearly depicts learning routes, and
proposes a more logical and effective model that aligns with modeling theorists’ criteria.