چکیده (انگلیسی):

NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), to be deployed on the International Space Station (ISS) in 2018, will provide billions of measurements of ground elevation and forest vertical structure. GEDI will acquire data only along transects or tracks, with between-track spacing of about 500 m. To fill the gaps in between these tracks and potentially produce higher spatial resolution products, appropriate fusion strategies between GEDI observations and other spatially contiguous datasets should be explored. One source of global data on canopy structure comes from the TanDEM-X (TDX) mission, which uses the technique of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to estimate surface structure. The goal of this paper is to explore the fusion of GEDI data with TDX for canopy height retrievals. In particular we examined the improvement in TDX height retrievals from a widely used scattering model – the Random Volume over Ground (RVoG) model using ancillary topographic data from simulated GEDI observations of surface elevation. Our study site is a mountainous, mixed-temperate forest: Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF). We started with a wall-to-wall lidar data set acquired by the Land Vegetation and Ice Sensor (LVIS) that provides a close analogue to anticipated GEDI waveforms. We derived a reference canopy height map and a reference bare earth digital terrain model (DTM) using LVIS. We next simulated GEDI ground tracks over HBEF for the nominal one-year period and extracted these observations from the reference DTM. A series of experiments were then conducted to examine the impact of ancillary topographic information. Using two different sets of TDX acquisitions, we compared height from RVoG respectively using no external DTM, the full LVIS DTM, and the DTM derived from simulated GEDI data against reference canopy heights at 90 m spatial resolution. With no external DTM to remove the ground phase, the RVoG model estimated heights with the best RMSE error (of the two TDX acquisitions dates) of 4.3 m and a bias of 2.5 m. Using the full LVIS DTM, results improved to 3.5 m RMSE and a bias of 1.3 m. Using the simulated GEDI DTM, the RMSE was 4.6 m with a bias of 1.8 m. The agreement between predicted and actual heights was good, ranging from an r2 of 0.39 (GEDI DTM) to 0.71 (p-value < 0.0001 for all r2) (full resolution DTM). We conclude that for our study area, TDX data used with the RVoG model was an effective means for estimating spatially continuous canopy structure. However, the large biases in height estimation require ancillary topographic data, such as those produced from GEDI, to reduce biases to acceptable levels.