برنامه های پژوهش تنفسی درمراقبت اولیه در پرتغال: یک مطالعه دلفی
The respiratory research agenda in primary care in Portugal: a Delphi study
نویسندگان |
این بخش تنها برای اعضا قابل مشاهده است ورودعضویت |
اطلاعات مجله |
Araújoet al. BMC Family Practice (2016) 17:124 DOI 10.1186/s12875-016-0512-1 |
سال انتشار |
2016 |
فرمت فایل |
PDF |
کد مقاله |
18410 |
پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.
چکیده (انگلیسی):
Background:A research agenda can help to stimulate and guide research. The International Primary Care
Respiratory Group (IPCRG) published a Research Needs Statement (RNS) in 2010 in which 145 research questions
were identified. In 2012, priorities for respiratory research were established, based on these questions. To date, there
has been no statement on primary care respiratory research needs in Portugal. The aim of the study was to
develop a national consensus on research priorities in respiratory diseases in primary care in Portugal and to assess
the applicability of the priorities for respiratory research set by the IPCRG.
Method:We conducted a Delphi study by electronic mail with a panel of experts on respiratory disease from
primary and secondary care in Portugal. In the first round, the research needs in respiratory disease in Portugal
were identified. In the second round, 196 research questions in six disease areas, derived from the first round and
from the IPCRG Respiratory needs statement, were prioritised on a five-point Likert-type scale. In the third round,
the questions were prioritized again with feed-back provided on the median scores for each item in the second
round. Consensus was considered to have been reached when 80 % of the participants gave a score of 4 or 5 out
of five on a given item.
Results:The 40 experts identified 121 respiratory research questions in Round 1 and expressed their views on 196
questions in Rounds 2 and 3. Twelve research questions (6 %) reached consensus. There were five questions in the
asthma domain on early diagnosis, pulmonary function tests, the use of inhalers, and adherence to treatment.
There were four questions in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease domain on vaccinations, on routine
monitoring and evaluation of treatment, on diagnosis, and on adherence to treatments. There was one question in
the smoking domain on the effects of brief counselling. There were two questions on respiratory tract infections on
the treatment of children and on the prescription of antibiotics. An additional 23 research questions (12 %)
achieved consensus between 75 and 79 %.
Conclusion:The results reflect the Portuguese reality in response the international agenda for research on
respiratory diseases published by the IPCRG. They can support the development of future respiratory disease
research in Portugal.
کلمات کلیدی مقاله (فارسی):
، بیماری مزمن انسدادی ریه؛ اتحادیه اروپا، اتحادیه اروپا؛ IPCRG، بین المللی اولیه مراقبت های تنفسی گروه؛ PHC، مراقبت های بهداشتی اولیه. RD، بیماری های تنفسی؛ RNS، تحقیقات نیاز بیانیه؛ WHO، سازمان جهانی بهداشت؛ WONCA، سازمان جهانی از پزشکان خانواده
کلمات کلیدی مقاله (انگلیسی):
Abbreviations:COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EU, European Union; IPCRG, International Primary Care Respiratory Group; PHC, Primary health care; RD, Respiratory diseases; RNS, Research needs statement; WHO, World Health Organization; WONCA, World Organization of Family Doctors
پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.