چکیده (انگلیسی):

Prejudice reduction research has focused on reducing negative regard as a means to improve relations between various
groups (e.g., religious, ethnic, political). Though positive regard between groups may be created, these forms of contact and
common identification do not alter policy orientations of advantaged groups toward disadvantaged ones. Rather than intergroup
contact, it is suggested that a collective action model of prejudice reduction (Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S., & Durrheim,
K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 41 1-425) would create ties between disadvantaged groups to work toward beneficial policy
change. We seek to show that the Gezi Park protests in T aksim, İstanbul functioned as an intergroup phenomenon, requiring
the cooperation of a number of disadvantaged groups (e.g., feminists, Kurds) working together to improve the status of all
present. In a series of interviews with 34 activists from the Gezi Park protests, participants were to reflect on their individual
and group-based experiences during their time in the Gezi Park protests. Data indicate that although a few groups remained
distant or disconnected during the protests, a common ground was achieved such that some participants were able to overcome
past prejudices. Data also indicate that through group perceptions and individuals’ descriptions of events, groups who had
previously not been able to cooperate were able to work and stick together at Gezi. Results also imply , in line with Dixon et
al. (2012), that if disadvantaged groups work together , they might change the position of their groups and improve each group’s
disadvantaged position via collective action.