چکیده (انگلیسی):

Authors of American psychology textbooks habitually refer to the “existential-humanistic” or “humanistic-existential” approach to treatment, while therapists in the UK and Europe say that this usage is inaccurate, and that the differences between the existential and humanistic approaches outweigh their similarities. To assess the merit of these competing claims, we must distinguish between literary and philosophical humanism, which is European in origin, and humanistic psychology, which is a recent American innovation. Having carefully discriminated between the two, it transpires that the similarities between the two approaches are often greater than Europeans concede, but also less than many Americans imagine. The fact that existential psychotherapy in Europe precedes American humanistic psychology by more than two decades entitles existential psychotherapists outside the USA to insist on the uniqueness and specificity of their approach.