چکیده (انگلیسی):

Whistleblowers are a key journalistic source for many current news stories. However, reporters
pursuing these major stories must navigate the dilemma between transparent full disclosure and
protecting their confidential source. Professional journalists begin their journey as students, and
students begin their journey in the classroom with a teacher and a textbook. But are journalism
students being trained to deal effectively, and sensitively, with a whistleblowing source who may
bring complex needs and difficulties to the news gathering process? This study explores how
contemporary introductory news writing textbooks tackle issues surrounding the use of unnamed
whistleblower sources. Beginning with a quantitative analysis as its foundation, the study
explores, qualitatively, the advice being offered to students on how to handle these sources. We
suggest that there are a number of important gaps that characterize textbooks when it comes to
whistleblowing and associated concepts, with scant attention being paid to, for example,
differentiation among varying types of anonymous source, the contextualization of a
whistleblower’s unique circumstances, and the potential of positive source motivation.
Suggestions are included for enhancing textbook content in this important area