ورود به سایت

در سایت حساب کاربری ندارید؟ ثبت نام در سایت (به زودی!)

ثبت نام

دانلود انواع مقالات آی اس آی

دسته بندی مقالات

با عضویت در سایت مقاله یاب از تخفیف ویژه بهرمند شوید! عضويت (به زودی!)
تاریخ امروز
دوشنبه, ۱۵ اردیبهشت

مراقبت های اولیه حرفه ای در مورد دیدن همه موارد پیشرفت با اجرای اولیه مراقبت از تیم: نتایج حاصل از یک مطالعه مقطعی

Do primary care professionals agree about progress with implementation of primary care teams: results from a cross sectional study

نویسندگان

این بخش تنها برای اعضا قابل مشاهده است

ورودعضویت
اطلاعات مجله Tierneyet al. BMC Family Practice (2016) 17:163 DOI 10.1186/s12875-016-0541-9
سال انتشار 2016
فرمت فایل PDF
کد مقاله 18102

پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.

اضافه‌کردن به سبدخرید

چکیده (انگلیسی):

Background:Primary care is the cornerstone of healthcare reform with policies across jurisdictions promoting
interdisciplinary team working. The effective implementation of such health policies requires understanding the
perspectives of all actors. However, there is a lack of research about health professionals’ views of this process. This
study compares Primary Healthcare Professionals’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the Primary Care Strategy and
Primary Care Team (PCT) implementation in Ireland.
Methods:Design and Setting: e-survey of (1) General Practitioners (GPs) associated with a Graduate Medical School
(N= 100) and (2) Primary Care Professionals in 3 of 4 Health Service Executive (HSE) regions (N= 2309). After
piloting, snowball sampling was used to administer the survey. Descriptive analysis was carried out using SPSS.
Ratings across groups were compared using non-parametric tests.
Results:There were 569 responses. Response rates varied across disciplines (71 % for GPs, 22 % for other Primary
Healthcare Professionals (PCPs). Respondents across all disciplines viewed interdisciplinary working as important.
Respondents agreed on lack of progress of implementation of formal PCTs (median rating of 2, where 1 is no
progress at all and 5 is complete implementation). GPs were more negative about the effectiveness of the Strategy
to promote different disciplines to work together (median rating of 2 compared to 3 for clinical therapists and 3.5
for nurses, P= 0.001). Respondents identified resources and GP participation as most important for effective team
working. Protected time for meetings and capacity to manage workload for meetings were rated as very important
factors for effective team working by GPs, clinical therapists and nurses. A building for co-location of teams was
rated as an important factor by nurses and clinical therapists though GPs rated it as less important. Payment to
attend meetings and contractual arrangements were considered important factors by GPs but not by nurses or
clinical therapists.
Conclusion:PCPs and GPs agree there is limited PCT implementation. GPs are most negative about this
implementation. There is some disagreement about which resources are most important for effective PCT working.
These findings provide valuable data for clinicians and policy makers about implementation of interdisciplinary
teams in primary care.
Keywords:

کلمات کلیدی مقاله (فارسی):

اجرای سیاست ها، نظر سنجی بهداشت و درمان، بهداشت و درمان، تیم درمانی، عمل به طور کلی، تیمهای میان رشته، سیاست های بهداشتی

کلمات کلیدی مقاله (انگلیسی):

Policy implementation, Health care surveys, Primary health care, Patient care team, General practice, Interdisciplinary teams, Health policy

پس از پرداخت آنلاین، فوراً لینک دانلود مقاله به شما نمایش داده می شود.

اضافه‌کردن به سبدخرید
کلیه حقوق مادی و معنوی برای ایران مقاله محفوظ است
در حال بارگذاری